A major transaction can be challenged in court when it was concluded as usual without a decision of the general meeting, or when the company did not comply with the decision-making procedure and the decision was made solely by the head or one of the owners.
Only the court recognizes the transaction as invalid. If the court finds the transaction invalid, the transaction will be like that from the moment it was made.
Features of judicial review of major transaction invalidation
A statement of claim for invalidation of a major transaction can be sent to court by: the owners of the company, the company itself, members of the board of directors (supervisory board), and the collegial executive body. Our lawyers are ready to study the documents, prepare a package of documents for the court and represent the interests of the client in court proceedings.
The court may not invalidate a major transaction when:
When there is no evidence that the transaction caused losses to the company or its owners, who went to court.
When the owners of the company, who were not at the general meeting, demand that the transaction be declared invalid, however, they received invitations to the meeting and their vote could not affect the results of voting for a major transaction.
By the time of the trial, the company had already completed the procedure for making a decision on a major transaction.
That is, the court does not invalidate a major transaction only because the company did not adhere to the procedure for making a decision on its commission.