Invalidation of Transactions with Affiliated Persons in Belarus

Licensed Belarusian advocates advising on the affiliated-party transaction procedure and representing clients in proceedings to invalidate transactions concluded in breach of that procedure.

Our clients

Home Corporate Law Invalid Transactions with Affiliated Persons

Overview

In addition to their owners, Belarusian business entities have affiliated persons — individuals and entities that can potentially influence the company’s activities, or whose activities the company can influence. Where an affiliated person has an interest in a transaction the company is planning to conclude, a special approval procedure must be followed. Where this procedure is not observed, the transaction may be challenged and declared invalid by a court.

AMBY Legal assesses transactions for affiliated-party interest, advises on the correct approval procedure, and represents clients in court proceedings to challenge transactions concluded in breach of the required procedure.

Decision-Making Procedure for Affiliated-Party Transactions

1. General Meeting of Shareholders

A decision on a transaction in which an affiliated person has an interest is made by the company’s competent management body — as a rule, the general meeting of participants. The articles of association may designate another body for this purpose. The general meeting adopts the decision by a majority vote of participants who are not interested in the transaction.

2. Board of Directors (Supervisory Board)

Where the company has a board of directors or supervisory board, that body may decide on an affiliated-party transaction where: the company’s articles of association expressly so provide; and the transaction value does not exceed 2% of the company’s asset value for the last reporting period — or a higher percentage specified in the charter.

The decision is adopted by a majority vote of all members of the board who are not interested in the transaction — the independent directors. Where there are insufficient independent directors to form a quorum, the decision is referred to the general meeting.

3. Director

The director or management board decides on an affiliated-party transaction without a general meeting vote where: all affiliated persons are owners of the company and are all interested in the transaction; or the company is buying back its own shares by its own decision or repurchasing shares at shareholder request — and such transactions have been concluded at least three times in the preceding year on standard terms.

Grounds for Invalidation

Where a company fails to follow the required procedure for approving an affiliated-party transaction, the transaction may be declared invalid by the court. However, invalidation is not automatic. The claimant must prove that the transaction violated their rights and caused losses — to the company, to its owners, or to the claimant personally.

The court will not invalidate an affiliated-party transaction where:

The votes of the owners or board members who were notified of the meeting and who are now demanding invalidation could not have affected the outcome of the vote on the transaction. The transaction did not cause losses to the company or to the owners who brought the claim, and there are no other adverse consequences. Before the court hearing, the company adopted the required decision on the transaction following the proper procedure — and submitted the relevant documents to the court.

Business Structuring in Belarus

Structure your business in Belarus with legal support — division, acquisition, and reorganization without risks!

Disclosure of Affiliated Party Information

Maintaining and updating a register of affiliated persons is mandatory for open and closed joint-stock companies under Instruction No. 43. JSCs are required to include a dedicated “Information About Affiliated Parties” form in their periodic reporting.

For limited liability companies and additional liability companies, maintaining such a register is not a statutory obligation — but becomes a practical necessity in the following situations:

Where the company’s participants have adopted internal rules requiring compliance with affiliated-party disclosure requirements, or where they are challenging transactions concluded by the director without the required prior approval.

Where the company is seeking funding from banks or financial institutions — domestic or foreign.

When Affiliated Persons Have an Interest in a Transaction

Where investors form part of the ownership structure and actively monitor financial decisions and transactions.

Where the company acts as a supplier, contractor, or service provider to international corporations.

In all such cases, maintaining an updated affiliated persons register is a practical prerequisite for legal compliance and transparency.

When an Affiliated Person Is Considered Interested in a Transaction

An affiliated person is considered interested in a transaction where that person: is a party to the transaction; or represents the interests of third parties in dealings with the company.

An affiliated person is also considered interested where: the person holds 20% or more of the shares or participation interest in the company, in the other party to the transaction, or in an entity representing third parties in dealings with the company; the person owns assets of such an entity; the person holds a management position in such an entity; or other circumstances specified in the company’s articles of association apply.

Services

Legal Consultation

We advise on whether a specific transaction involves affiliated-party interest under Belarusian law and assess the prospects for challenging it.

Transaction Support

We draft and review transaction documents and the required approval documentation — ensuring the procedure is properly observed.

Pre-Trial Documentation

We prepare the document package to support a challenge to an affiliated-party transaction before filing a court claim.

Lawsuit Preparation

We compile the full court filing package — statement of claim, supporting evidence, and legal submissions.

Court Representation

We represent clients in Belarusian court proceedings seeking invalidation of affiliated-party transactions.

Who Qualifies as an Affiliated Person

Company Executives and Board Members

Members of the board of directors, supervisory board, and executive management are affiliated persons by virtue of their direct involvement in company governance.

Entities in the Same Holding

Legal entities forming part of the same holding structure as the company are affiliated persons due to shared ownership or control.

Individuals with 20%+ Ownership

Individuals who — alone or together with close relatives (spouses, parents, children, grandchildren, siblings, in-laws) — own or control 20% or more of the company's shares or charter capital.

External Entities with 20%+ Ownership

Legal entities that own or control 20% or more of the company's shares, or have a contractual right to influence company decisions.

Entities Controlled by the Company

Legal entities in which the company holds 20% or more of the capital or has contractual decision-making influence.

Unitary Enterprises Created by the Company

Unitary enterprises established by the company are wholly dependent on it and are therefore affiliated.

Executives of Affiliated Legal Entities

Members of collective management bodies and executives of legal entities affiliated with the company are also treated as affiliated persons.

When an Affiliated Person Is Considered Interested

Direct Participation or Representation

The affiliated person is a party to the transaction or represents third-party interests in dealings with the company.

20%+ Ownership in Related Entity

The affiliated person individually or jointly owns 20% or more of the shares or charter capital of the entity that is party to the transaction or represents third-party interests.

Ownership of Related Entity’s Assets

The affiliated person owns the assets of the entity that is party to the transaction or represents third-party interests.

Management Role in Related Entity

The affiliated person holds a management position in the entity that is party to the transaction or represents third-party interests.

Other Charter-Defined Situations

Other situations in which affiliated-party interest arises as defined in the company's articles of association

Corporate Lawyers in Belarus

Get corporate legal support in Belarus for companies and legal entities to protect and grow your business!

How to Execute an Affiliated-Party Transaction Correctly

1

Identify Affiliated Persons

The company must identify its affiliated persons in accordance with internal rules, maintain an updated register, and notify them in writing.
2

Maintain a Register

The director is generally responsible for maintaining the affiliated persons register — a prerequisite for properly identifying and approving interested-party transactions.
3

Obtain Prior Approval

Where affiliated-party interest is present, the company must obtain prior approval from the general meeting or board of directors before executing the transaction.
4

Ensure a Valid Quorum

A decision is valid where over 50% of voting rights are represented. Where no quorum is achieved, a second meeting may be convened with a reduced threshold of at least 30% — unless the charter requires a higher minimum.
5

When Approval Is Not Required

Approval is not required where all participants are affiliated persons and all are interested in the transaction, or where the transaction is part of regular business activity conducted on standard terms at least three times in the preceding 12 months.
6

Execute the Transaction

Once approval is obtained, the company may proceed to execute the transaction in accordance with the applicable corporate procedures and documentation standards.
7

Post-Factum Approval

Where a transaction was executed before obtaining the required approval, retrospective approval is possible — following the same procedure as prior approval.
8

Challenging a Transaction

The company, its participants, or board members may challenge a transaction in court where it was concluded in breach of the required procedure.
9

Proving Improper Notice

To successfully challenge a transaction, the claimant must establish that proper notice of the meeting was not given. Even if the vote would not have changed the outcome, absence of proper notice may support a claim.
10

Demonstrating Loss or Harm

A further basis for challenging the transaction is demonstrating that it caused — or could cause — losses to the company or its participants, or resulted in other adverse consequences.
11

Effect of Subsequent Approval

Where the company subsequently ratifies the transaction through a formal resolution following the proper procedure, the court will likely treat the transaction as valid and decline to declare it invalid.

Why Foreign Companies Choose AMBY Legal

We Speak Your Language

We communicate with foreign clients in English throughout — explaining the applicable Belarusian corporate law requirements clearly at every stage.

Recognised Excellence

Our team has a consistent record of successfully handling corporate disputes — including affiliated-party transaction challenges — before Belarusian courts.

Fast Response Time

We respond promptly and move cases forward without unnecessary delay — important where limitation periods or procedural deadlines apply.

Competitive Prices

Our fees are transparent and agreed upfront — with no hidden costs or unexpected charges during the engagement.

Specialised Practice Areas

We focus specifically on corporate law and shareholder disputes — providing expert advice in areas where general practice firms typically lack depth.

International Reach

We represent foreign clients in Belarusian proceedings entirely remotely under a power of attorney — no travel to Belarus required.

FAQ

Who is considered an affiliated person under Belarusian corporate law?

Belarusian law defines affiliated persons broadly. The category includes members of the board of directors and company executives, legal entities within the same holding structure, individuals who — alone or together with close relatives — own 20% or more of the company’s shares or charter capital, legal entities in which the company itself holds 20% or more, and unitary enterprises founded by the company. Importantly, the Republic of Belarus, its territorial units, the National Bank, and government authorities cannot be classified as affiliated parties. Each company is responsible for defining, registering, and notifying its affiliated persons in writing.

When is an affiliated person considered to have an interest in a transaction?

An affiliated party is deemed interested in a deal when they are a direct party to the transaction, represent third-party interests in dealings with the company, own 20% or more of the shares in the counterparty company, hold assets of the counterparty, or serve in a management capacity at the counterparty organization. Additional situations triggering interested-party status may also be defined in the company’s own charter.

What approval procedure is required before concluding a transaction with an affiliated person?

The required approval body depends on the company’s structure and the size of the transaction. By default, the general meeting of participants decides on interested-party transactions by a majority vote of those not personally interested in the deal. If the company has a board of directors and the transaction value does not exceed 2% of the company’s assets (or a higher threshold set in the charter), the board may approve it instead — by a majority of independent directors. The director may act without broader approval only when all participants are interested parties or when the transaction is a recurring standard business activity conducted at least three times in the preceding 12 months.

Under what circumstances can a transaction with an affiliated person be declared invalid in court?

A court may void an interested-party transaction when the required approval procedure was not followed. However, the claimant — typically a shareholder, board member, or the company itself — must actively prove that the transaction violated their rights and caused actual losses or other adverse consequences. The court will not automatically invalidate such a transaction simply because a procedural requirement was missed. The burden of proof rests with the party challenging the deal.

Are there situations where a procedurally flawed transaction with an affiliate will still be upheld by the court?

Yes. Even when approval requirements were not observed, the court will generally refuse to void the transaction if: the votes of shareholders who were not properly notified would not have changed the outcome anyway; the deal caused no losses to the company or its participants; or if, before the case is decided, the company formally ratifies the transaction through the proper approval process and submits the relevant documents to the court. Post-factum approval follows the same procedure as prior approval and has the same legal effect.

Which companies are required to maintain a register of affiliated persons, and which are not?

Open and closed joint-stock companies (JSCs) are obligated by law to maintain and regularly update an affiliated persons register and to include a dedicated disclosure form in their periodic reporting. Limited liability companies (LLCs) and additional liability companies (ALCs) are not subject to this mandatory requirement by default, but maintaining such a register becomes practically necessary when the company’s internal rules require it, when external investors actively monitor financial decisions, when the company seeks financing from banks or financial institutions, or when it operates as a supplier or contractor for international corporations.

What legal assistance does Amby Legal provide in disputes over affiliated-party transactions?

Amby Legal offers full-cycle support: from evaluating whether a specific transaction qualifies as an interested-party deal and assessing the risks of its potential invalidation, to drafting compliant transaction documentation, preparing pre-trial claim packages, and representing clients in court proceedings. With over 10 years of judicial representation experience, the firm handles both the challenge and the defense of affiliated-party transactions, depending on the client’s position in the dispute.

News

How to Enforce a Foreign Arbitration Award in Belarus

You won the arbitration. Months of hearings, written submissions, and legal costs — and the tribunal ruled your way. The award exists on paper. The Belarusian counterparty knows it. And nothing has moved. Getting paid is a different fight entirely. Belarus does recognise foreign arbitral awards — but turning that recognition into actual money involves […]

By AMBY Legal Team
10.04.2026
How to Recover a Debt from a Belarusian Company as a Foreign Creditor

The contract was signed. Goods were delivered, services rendered, money lent. And then — silence. Payment deadlines passed, calls went unanswered, and the emails from your Belarusian partner became increasingly vague. Now you’re sitting on an unpaid invoice and wondering whether there’s anything you can actually do from abroad. The short answer is yes. Belarus […]

By AMBY Legal Team
08.04.2026
Changing the Director of an LLC in Belarus: What You Need to Know

Most companies don’t think much about changing a director until they have to. Then they find out the hard way that getting it wrong — even slightly — can leave the business stuck in an awkward gap: the old director still legally in charge, the new one unable to sign anything or move money. We’ve […]

By AMBY Legal Team
06.04.2026

Contact us