Invalidation of Transactions with Affiliated Persons in Belarus
Our clients
Overview
In addition to their owners, Belarusian business entities have affiliated persons — individuals and entities that can potentially influence the company’s activities, or whose activities the company can influence. Where an affiliated person has an interest in a transaction the company is planning to conclude, a special approval procedure must be followed. Where this procedure is not observed, the transaction may be challenged and declared invalid by a court.
AMBY Legal assesses transactions for affiliated-party interest, advises on the correct approval procedure, and represents clients in court proceedings to challenge transactions concluded in breach of the required procedure.
Decision-Making Procedure for Affiliated-Party Transactions
1. General Meeting of Shareholders
A decision on a transaction in which an affiliated person has an interest is made by the company’s competent management body — as a rule, the general meeting of participants. The articles of association may designate another body for this purpose. The general meeting adopts the decision by a majority vote of participants who are not interested in the transaction.
2. Board of Directors (Supervisory Board)
Where the company has a board of directors or supervisory board, that body may decide on an affiliated-party transaction where: the company’s articles of association expressly so provide; and the transaction value does not exceed 2% of the company’s asset value for the last reporting period — or a higher percentage specified in the charter.
The decision is adopted by a majority vote of all members of the board who are not interested in the transaction — the independent directors. Where there are insufficient independent directors to form a quorum, the decision is referred to the general meeting.
3. Director
The director or management board decides on an affiliated-party transaction without a general meeting vote where: all affiliated persons are owners of the company and are all interested in the transaction; or the company is buying back its own shares by its own decision or repurchasing shares at shareholder request — and such transactions have been concluded at least three times in the preceding year on standard terms.
Grounds for Invalidation
Where a company fails to follow the required procedure for approving an affiliated-party transaction, the transaction may be declared invalid by the court. However, invalidation is not automatic. The claimant must prove that the transaction violated their rights and caused losses — to the company, to its owners, or to the claimant personally.
The court will not invalidate an affiliated-party transaction where:
The votes of the owners or board members who were notified of the meeting and who are now demanding invalidation could not have affected the outcome of the vote on the transaction. The transaction did not cause losses to the company or to the owners who brought the claim, and there are no other adverse consequences. Before the court hearing, the company adopted the required decision on the transaction following the proper procedure — and submitted the relevant documents to the court.
Business Structuring in Belarus
Structure your business in Belarus with legal support — division, acquisition, and reorganization without risks!
Disclosure of Affiliated Party Information
Maintaining and updating a register of affiliated persons is mandatory for open and closed joint-stock companies under Instruction No. 43. JSCs are required to include a dedicated “Information About Affiliated Parties” form in their periodic reporting.
For limited liability companies and additional liability companies, maintaining such a register is not a statutory obligation — but becomes a practical necessity in the following situations:
Where the company’s participants have adopted internal rules requiring compliance with affiliated-party disclosure requirements, or where they are challenging transactions concluded by the director without the required prior approval.
Where the company is seeking funding from banks or financial institutions — domestic or foreign.
When Affiliated Persons Have an Interest in a Transaction
Where investors form part of the ownership structure and actively monitor financial decisions and transactions.
Where the company acts as a supplier, contractor, or service provider to international corporations.
In all such cases, maintaining an updated affiliated persons register is a practical prerequisite for legal compliance and transparency.
When an Affiliated Person Is Considered Interested in a Transaction
An affiliated person is considered interested in a transaction where that person: is a party to the transaction; or represents the interests of third parties in dealings with the company.
An affiliated person is also considered interested where: the person holds 20% or more of the shares or participation interest in the company, in the other party to the transaction, or in an entity representing third parties in dealings with the company; the person owns assets of such an entity; the person holds a management position in such an entity; or other circumstances specified in the company’s articles of association apply.
Services
Transaction Support
Pre-Trial Documentation
Lawsuit Preparation
Court Representation
Who Qualifies as an Affiliated Person
Company Executives and Board Members
Entities in the Same Holding
Individuals with 20%+ Ownership
External Entities with 20%+ Ownership
Entities Controlled by the Company
Unitary Enterprises Created by the Company
Executives of Affiliated Legal Entities
When an Affiliated Person Is Considered Interested
Corporate Lawyers in Belarus
Get corporate legal support in Belarus for companies and legal entities to protect and grow your business!
How to Execute an Affiliated-Party Transaction Correctly
Identify Affiliated Persons
Maintain a Register
Obtain Prior Approval
Ensure a Valid Quorum
When Approval Is Not Required
Execute the Transaction
Post-Factum Approval
Challenging a Transaction
Proving Improper Notice
Demonstrating Loss or Harm
Effect of Subsequent Approval
Why Foreign Companies Choose AMBY Legal
We Speak Your Language
Recognised Excellence
Fast Response Time
Competitive Prices
Specialised Practice Areas
International Reach
FAQ
Belarusian law defines affiliated persons broadly. The category includes members of the board of directors and company executives, legal entities within the same holding structure, individuals who — alone or together with close relatives — own 20% or more of the company’s shares or charter capital, legal entities in which the company itself holds 20% or more, and unitary enterprises founded by the company. Importantly, the Republic of Belarus, its territorial units, the National Bank, and government authorities cannot be classified as affiliated parties. Each company is responsible for defining, registering, and notifying its affiliated persons in writing.
An affiliated party is deemed interested in a deal when they are a direct party to the transaction, represent third-party interests in dealings with the company, own 20% or more of the shares in the counterparty company, hold assets of the counterparty, or serve in a management capacity at the counterparty organization. Additional situations triggering interested-party status may also be defined in the company’s own charter.
The required approval body depends on the company’s structure and the size of the transaction. By default, the general meeting of participants decides on interested-party transactions by a majority vote of those not personally interested in the deal. If the company has a board of directors and the transaction value does not exceed 2% of the company’s assets (or a higher threshold set in the charter), the board may approve it instead — by a majority of independent directors. The director may act without broader approval only when all participants are interested parties or when the transaction is a recurring standard business activity conducted at least three times in the preceding 12 months.
A court may void an interested-party transaction when the required approval procedure was not followed. However, the claimant — typically a shareholder, board member, or the company itself — must actively prove that the transaction violated their rights and caused actual losses or other adverse consequences. The court will not automatically invalidate such a transaction simply because a procedural requirement was missed. The burden of proof rests with the party challenging the deal.
Yes. Even when approval requirements were not observed, the court will generally refuse to void the transaction if: the votes of shareholders who were not properly notified would not have changed the outcome anyway; the deal caused no losses to the company or its participants; or if, before the case is decided, the company formally ratifies the transaction through the proper approval process and submits the relevant documents to the court. Post-factum approval follows the same procedure as prior approval and has the same legal effect.
Open and closed joint-stock companies (JSCs) are obligated by law to maintain and regularly update an affiliated persons register and to include a dedicated disclosure form in their periodic reporting. Limited liability companies (LLCs) and additional liability companies (ALCs) are not subject to this mandatory requirement by default, but maintaining such a register becomes practically necessary when the company’s internal rules require it, when external investors actively monitor financial decisions, when the company seeks financing from banks or financial institutions, or when it operates as a supplier or contractor for international corporations.
Amby Legal offers full-cycle support: from evaluating whether a specific transaction qualifies as an interested-party deal and assessing the risks of its potential invalidation, to drafting compliant transaction documentation, preparing pre-trial claim packages, and representing clients in court proceedings. With over 10 years of judicial representation experience, the firm handles both the challenge and the defense of affiliated-party transactions, depending on the client’s position in the dispute.
News
You won the arbitration. Months of hearings, written submissions, and legal costs — and the tribunal ruled your way. The award exists on paper. The Belarusian counterparty knows it. And nothing has moved. Getting paid is a different fight entirely. Belarus does recognise foreign arbitral awards — but turning that recognition into actual money involves […]
The contract was signed. Goods were delivered, services rendered, money lent. And then — silence. Payment deadlines passed, calls went unanswered, and the emails from your Belarusian partner became increasingly vague. Now you’re sitting on an unpaid invoice and wondering whether there’s anything you can actually do from abroad. The short answer is yes. Belarus […]
Most companies don’t think much about changing a director until they have to. Then they find out the hard way that getting it wrong — even slightly — can leave the business stuck in an awkward gap: the old director still legally in charge, the new one unable to sign anything or move money. We’ve […]