Intellectual Property Disputes: Litigation in the Belarusian IP Court

Licensed Belarusian advocates representing rights holders and defendants before the Judicial Panel on Intellectual Property of the Supreme Court of Belarus.

Our clients

Home Intellectual Property Disputes

Overview

Where intellectual property disputes cannot be resolved through negotiation or pre-trial claims, rights holders may bring proceedings before the Judicial Panel on Intellectual Property of the Supreme Court of Belarus. This specialised panel handles both infringement claims and appeals against decisions of the patent authority, the Board of Appeal, and the antimonopoly body. Proceedings before the IP Panel require specific expertise — both in substantive intellectual property law and in the procedural rules applicable to this court. AMBY Legal represents rights holders and defendants in all categories of IP litigation before the Panel.

Categories of Intellectual Property Under Belarusian Law

Belarusian IP law covers three primary categories of protected rights. Copyright and related rights protect literary, scientific, and artistic works, as well as performances, phonogram recordings, and broadcasts — arising automatically without registration. Industrial property — including patents, utility models, industrial designs, trademarks, service marks, trade secrets, plant varieties, and geographical indications — requires formal registration and examination by the National Centre of Intellectual Property (NCIP). In practice, the majority of IP litigation involves copyright infringement and trademark misuse — areas requiring detailed analysis of originality, ownership, and market confusion.

Legal Classification of IP in Belarus

Under Belarusian law, IP rights are classified into two main categories. Copyright and related rights protect creative works — literature, art, photographs, audiovisual materials, performances, and recordings — and arise automatically upon creation without registration. Industrial property — including inventions, utility models, trademarks, trade names, and trade secrets — is protected following formal examination and registration by the NCIP, which operates under the State Committee on Science and Technology. Once registered in the state IP register and a patent or certificate is issued, industrial property receives full legal protection under Belarusian law.

Jurisdiction of the IP Panel

In Belarus, intellectual property disputes are heard by the Judicial Panel on Intellectual Property of the Supreme Court. This specialised panel has exclusive jurisdiction over IP infringement claims and appeals against decisions of the patent authority, the Board of Appeal, and the Ministry of Antimonopoly Regulation and Trade. Due to the specific procedural and substantive requirements of proceedings before the Panel, representation by advocates with experience in IP litigation is strongly recommended.

Dispute Resolution

Legal support for dispute resolution in Belarus — protecting your business’s financial and reputational interests!

How to Apply to the IP Panel

Applications to the IP Panel may take one of two forms — a statement of claim or a complaint — depending on the nature of the dispute.

A statement of claim is filed where the dispute arises from a violation of the rights holder’s exclusive rights to an intellectual property object.

A complaint is filed where the applicant challenges a decision of a state authority — for example, a decision of the patent authority, the Board of Appeal, or the Ministry of Antimonopoly Regulation and Trade.

Remedies Available in IP Claims

A statement of claim before the IP Panel may include the following remedies: recovery of compensation (royalties or statutory compensation); an order to cease the actions violating the exclusive right; compensation for damages; compensation for moral harm in connection with violations of the author’s rights; and other remedies provided by law.

Claims for trademark infringement may be brought against multiple defendants individually or in a single consolidated statement of claim. AMBY Legal advises on the available remedies and prepares the full documentation package for IP proceedings.

State Fees for Claims

Before filing a statement of claim with the IP Panel, a state fee must be paid. For monetary claims, the fee is 5% of the claim amount — not less than 2 base units (currently 84 Belarusian rubles). For non-monetary or non-assessable claims, companies and individual entrepreneurs pay 50 base units (currently 2,100 rubles); individuals pay 20 base units (currently 840 rubles).

Filing a Complaint Against an Authority Decision

A complaint to the IP Panel is filed where the applicant disagrees with a decision of a state body on an intellectual property matter. The most common appeals include decisions of the Board of Appeal at the patent authority concerning patents for inventions, utility models, and trademarks.

Decisions that may be appealed include: the patent authority’s decision to grant a patent; the Board of Appeal’s decision on a complaint against a refusal to grant a patent; the Board of Appeal’s decision on an objection to a granted patent; and the Ministry of Antimonopoly Regulation and Trade’s decision recognising a trademark registration as unfair competition.

Deadlines for Filing Complaints

Complaint deadlines: Complaints against decisions of the National Intellectual Property Centre based on trademark examination results may be filed with the IP Panel within one year from the date of receipt of the decision. Complaints against decisions of the Board of Appeal at the patent authority may be filed within six months from the date of receipt of the decision.

State Fee for Complaints

Before filing a complaint with the IP Panel, a state fee must be paid. For companies and individual entrepreneurs, the fee is 50 base units (currently 2,100 rubles). For individuals, the fee is 20 base units (currently 840 rubles).

Trademark distinctiveness: In cases concerning refusals to register a trademark, the Panel examines whether the proposed designation possesses the required distinctiveness. Signs lacking distinctiveness — such as single letters, numerals, lines, or mathematical symbols — cannot be registered as trademarks.

Trademark Non-Use: Early Termination of Protection

Where a registered trademark has not been used by its owner — without valid reason — for three years following registration, its legal protection may be terminated early. In proceedings for early termination, the court verifies whether the trademark was genuinely used during the relevant period by the owner or their licensee, and examines the reasons for non-use.

The defendant (trademark owner) bears the burden of proving that the trademark was used during the three-year period. The claimant must demonstrate their genuine interest in the trademark — that is, an intention and commercial need to use it. Where a claimant has no genuine interest in using the trademark, the court will not grant early termination even if the trademark has been dormant for three years.

Our Services

Patent Dispute Consultation

We advise on the grounds and prospects for appealing decisions of the patent authority or the Board of Appeal before the IP Panel.

Preparation and Filing of Complaints

We prepare the complaint, supporting documents, and state fee payment — and file with the IP Panel on the client's behalf.

Representation Before the IP Panel

We represent clients in all stages of proceedings before the Judicial Panel on Intellectual Property of the Supreme Court — presenting the case and protecting the client's interests throughout.

Decisions That Can Be Appealed

Patent Grant Decision

The patent authority's decision to grant a patent may be challenged where it violates legal standards or infringes existing rights.

Appeal Board Rejection

The Board of Appeal's decision upholding a refusal to grant a patent may be contested before the IP Panel.

Appeal Board Objection

The Board of Appeal's decision upholding an objection to a granted patent may be appealed to protect the patent's validity.

Unfair Competition Ruling

The Ministry of Antimonopoly Regulation's decision declaring a trademark registration as unfair competition may be challenged before the IP Panel.

Intellectual Property Protection

Obtain expert intellectual property protection in Belarus for your company!

Industrial Property Disputes Before the IP Panel

Appeals Against Patent Board Decisions

Complaints against the Board of Appeal's decisions — including refusals and approvals of patent and trademark applications.

Recognition of Authorship

Disputes over the recognition of the true author of an industrial property object.

Removal of Co-Authors

Claims to remove individuals wrongly listed as co-authors from patent applications or registered patents.

Determining Patent Ownership

Disputes over who holds ownership rights to an invention — including whether the invention qualifies as a service invention.

Patent Termination Disputes

Challenges to unlawful early termination of patents and applications for reinstatement of patent rights.

Trademark Cancellation

Claims for early termination of trademark registration due to non-use or other legal grounds.

Rationalization Proposal Disputes

Legal issues regarding refusal to recognise or annulment of rationalization proposals.

Author’s Compensation Claims

Claims for fair monetary rewards for authors of protected industrial property objects.

Rationalization Reward Claims

Disputes over unpaid compensation for the use of a rationalization proposal.

License Fee Recovery

Claims to recover unpaid royalties or licence fees under licensing agreements.

License Termination Disputes

Claims for lawful termination of licensing agreements due to breach or changed circumstances.

Invalid License Termination

Challenges to one-sided or unlawful termination of licence agreements.

Invalid Use Agreements

Claims involving the invalidity of agreements for the use of industrial property objects.

Infringement and Damages

Claims for IP rights violations — including compensation for unauthorised use of patents or trademarks.

Trademark Misuse Fines

Proceedings for the imposition of fines for the illegal use of a trademark.

Moral and Economic Damage

Claims for compensation of material losses and moral harm caused by IP rights violations.

Online Brand Infringement

Domain name and online trademark disputes — including misuse in digital and internet environments.

Well-Known Trademark Status

Appeals of decisions on the recognition or rejection of well-known trademark status in Belarus.

Unfair Competition in Registration

Disputes over trademark registrations recognised as acts of unfair competition by the antimonopoly authority.

Copyright and Related Rights Disputes

Recognition of Authorship

Claims to establish legal authorship over a creative work — including literary, artistic, or scientific content.

Authorship Disputes

Cases where authorship is contested by another party with conflicting claims.

Removal from Author List

Proceedings to exclude individuals wrongly credited as co-authors from official records or registrations.

Copyright Infringement Claims

Cases involving illegal use or reproduction of copyrighted works and violations of related rights.

Compensation for Copyright Violations

Claims for financial compensation for damages from unauthorised use or distribution of protected works.

Author’s Royalty Disputes

Cases involving unpaid or underpaid royalties owed to authors under publishing or licensing agreements.

Moral Harm in Related Rights

Claims for moral damages caused by violations of performers', producers', or broadcasters' rights.

Damage Recovery

Claims for financial losses suffered due to copyright or related rights infringement.

Profits From Infringement

Claims requiring infringers to surrender profits earned through unauthorised exploitation of copyrighted content.

Why Foreign Companies Choose AMBY Legal

Client-Oriented

We prioritise the client's specific objectives — developing a tailored strategy for each IP dispute rather than applying a standard approach.

Comprehensive Approach

We address all aspects of the proceedings — from initial assessment and pre-trial claims through to court representation and enforcement.

Competence

Our advocates understand the specific procedural and substantive requirements of proceedings before the Belarusian IP Panel — and apply current case law to each matter.

Proven Experience

We have represented clients in patent, trademark, and copyright disputes before the Belarusian IP Panel — achieving favourable outcomes in complex and high-stakes cases.

International Clients

We assist foreign rights holders in navigating the Belarusian IP litigation system — managing all procedural steps and communications in English.

High Qualification

Our specialists have advanced expertise in intellectual property law — ensuring technically accurate and legally sound representation in IP proceedings.

FAQ

What types of IP claims can be filed with the Judicial Panel on Intellectual Property of the Supreme Court of Belarus?

The Panel hears: trademark and trade name disputes; patent and utility model disputes; copyright and related rights claims; licensing disputes; unfair competition in IP registration; claims for damages and compensation; and appeals against decisions of the NCIP, the Board of Appeal, and the Ministry of Antimonopoly Regulation and Trade.

What is the state fee for filing an IP claim or complaint with the Supreme Court?

For monetary claims, the fee is 5% of the claimed amount — not less than 2 base units (currently 84 rubles). For non-monetary claims, companies and individual entrepreneurs pay 50 base units (currently 2,100 rubles); individuals pay 20 base units (currently 840 rubles). Supervisory appeal fees are 80% of the initial filing fee.

Is a mandatory pre-trial claim required before filing with the IP Panel?

Yes — for disputes between legal entities and individual entrepreneurs. A formal written pre-trial claim must be sent to the other party before proceedings may be initiated. The response period is one month unless the contract specifies otherwise. Individual rights holders are not required to send a pre-trial claim, though it is advisable. AMBY Legal prepares pre-trial claims and manages the full dispute process.

Who may represent a client before the IP Panel of the Supreme Court of Belarus?

Representation may be carried out by the company’s director, an authorised employee, a licensed advocate, a patent attorney, or in-house legal counsel. Foreign clients must provide a notarised power of attorney — which must be apostilled or consularly legalised depending on the country of origin. AMBY Legal manages all representation requirements for foreign clients.

How long does it take to resolve IP disputes before the Supreme Court?

Cases involving Belarusian applicants must be resolved within two months from filing. For foreign applicants, the timeframe may be up to one year. Appeals arising from administrative decisions must be resolved within one month from filing.

News

How to Enforce a Foreign Arbitration Award in Belarus

You won the arbitration. Months of hearings, written submissions, and legal costs — and the tribunal ruled your way. The award exists on paper. The Belarusian counterparty knows it. And nothing has moved. Getting paid is a different fight entirely. Belarus does recognise foreign arbitral awards — but turning that recognition into actual money involves […]

By AMBY Legal Team
10.04.2026
How to Recover a Debt from a Belarusian Company as a Foreign Creditor

The contract was signed. Goods were delivered, services rendered, money lent. And then — silence. Payment deadlines passed, calls went unanswered, and the emails from your Belarusian partner became increasingly vague. Now you’re sitting on an unpaid invoice and wondering whether there’s anything you can actually do from abroad. The short answer is yes. Belarus […]

By AMBY Legal Team
08.04.2026
Changing the Director of an LLC in Belarus: What You Need to Know

Most companies don’t think much about changing a director until they have to. Then they find out the hard way that getting it wrong — even slightly — can leave the business stuck in an awkward gap: the old director still legally in charge, the new one unable to sign anything or move money. We’ve […]

By AMBY Legal Team
06.04.2026

Contact us