Intellectual Property Disputes: Litigation in the Belarusian IP Court
Our clients
Overview
Where intellectual property disputes cannot be resolved through negotiation or pre-trial claims, rights holders may bring proceedings before the Judicial Panel on Intellectual Property of the Supreme Court of Belarus. This specialised panel handles both infringement claims and appeals against decisions of the patent authority, the Board of Appeal, and the antimonopoly body. Proceedings before the IP Panel require specific expertise — both in substantive intellectual property law and in the procedural rules applicable to this court. AMBY Legal represents rights holders and defendants in all categories of IP litigation before the Panel.
Categories of Intellectual Property Under Belarusian Law
Belarusian IP law covers three primary categories of protected rights. Copyright and related rights protect literary, scientific, and artistic works, as well as performances, phonogram recordings, and broadcasts — arising automatically without registration. Industrial property — including patents, utility models, industrial designs, trademarks, service marks, trade secrets, plant varieties, and geographical indications — requires formal registration and examination by the National Centre of Intellectual Property (NCIP). In practice, the majority of IP litigation involves copyright infringement and trademark misuse — areas requiring detailed analysis of originality, ownership, and market confusion.
Legal Classification of IP in Belarus
Under Belarusian law, IP rights are classified into two main categories. Copyright and related rights protect creative works — literature, art, photographs, audiovisual materials, performances, and recordings — and arise automatically upon creation without registration. Industrial property — including inventions, utility models, trademarks, trade names, and trade secrets — is protected following formal examination and registration by the NCIP, which operates under the State Committee on Science and Technology. Once registered in the state IP register and a patent or certificate is issued, industrial property receives full legal protection under Belarusian law.
Jurisdiction of the IP Panel
In Belarus, intellectual property disputes are heard by the Judicial Panel on Intellectual Property of the Supreme Court. This specialised panel has exclusive jurisdiction over IP infringement claims and appeals against decisions of the patent authority, the Board of Appeal, and the Ministry of Antimonopoly Regulation and Trade. Due to the specific procedural and substantive requirements of proceedings before the Panel, representation by advocates with experience in IP litigation is strongly recommended.
Dispute Resolution
Legal support for dispute resolution in Belarus — protecting your business’s financial and reputational interests!
How to Apply to the IP Panel
Applications to the IP Panel may take one of two forms — a statement of claim or a complaint — depending on the nature of the dispute.
A statement of claim is filed where the dispute arises from a violation of the rights holder’s exclusive rights to an intellectual property object.
A complaint is filed where the applicant challenges a decision of a state authority — for example, a decision of the patent authority, the Board of Appeal, or the Ministry of Antimonopoly Regulation and Trade.
Remedies Available in IP Claims
A statement of claim before the IP Panel may include the following remedies: recovery of compensation (royalties or statutory compensation); an order to cease the actions violating the exclusive right; compensation for damages; compensation for moral harm in connection with violations of the author’s rights; and other remedies provided by law.
Claims for trademark infringement may be brought against multiple defendants individually or in a single consolidated statement of claim. AMBY Legal advises on the available remedies and prepares the full documentation package for IP proceedings.
State Fees for Claims
Before filing a statement of claim with the IP Panel, a state fee must be paid. For monetary claims, the fee is 5% of the claim amount — not less than 2 base units (currently 84 Belarusian rubles). For non-monetary or non-assessable claims, companies and individual entrepreneurs pay 50 base units (currently 2,100 rubles); individuals pay 20 base units (currently 840 rubles).
Filing a Complaint Against an Authority Decision
A complaint to the IP Panel is filed where the applicant disagrees with a decision of a state body on an intellectual property matter. The most common appeals include decisions of the Board of Appeal at the patent authority concerning patents for inventions, utility models, and trademarks.
Decisions that may be appealed include: the patent authority’s decision to grant a patent; the Board of Appeal’s decision on a complaint against a refusal to grant a patent; the Board of Appeal’s decision on an objection to a granted patent; and the Ministry of Antimonopoly Regulation and Trade’s decision recognising a trademark registration as unfair competition.
Deadlines for Filing Complaints
Complaint deadlines: Complaints against decisions of the National Intellectual Property Centre based on trademark examination results may be filed with the IP Panel within one year from the date of receipt of the decision. Complaints against decisions of the Board of Appeal at the patent authority may be filed within six months from the date of receipt of the decision.
State Fee for Complaints
Before filing a complaint with the IP Panel, a state fee must be paid. For companies and individual entrepreneurs, the fee is 50 base units (currently 2,100 rubles). For individuals, the fee is 20 base units (currently 840 rubles).
Trademark distinctiveness: In cases concerning refusals to register a trademark, the Panel examines whether the proposed designation possesses the required distinctiveness. Signs lacking distinctiveness — such as single letters, numerals, lines, or mathematical symbols — cannot be registered as trademarks.
Trademark Non-Use: Early Termination of Protection
Where a registered trademark has not been used by its owner — without valid reason — for three years following registration, its legal protection may be terminated early. In proceedings for early termination, the court verifies whether the trademark was genuinely used during the relevant period by the owner or their licensee, and examines the reasons for non-use.
The defendant (trademark owner) bears the burden of proving that the trademark was used during the three-year period. The claimant must demonstrate their genuine interest in the trademark — that is, an intention and commercial need to use it. Where a claimant has no genuine interest in using the trademark, the court will not grant early termination even if the trademark has been dormant for three years.
Our Services
Preparation and Filing of Complaints
Representation Before the IP Panel
Decisions That Can Be Appealed
Patent Grant Decision
Appeal Board Rejection
Appeal Board Objection
Unfair Competition Ruling
Intellectual Property Protection
Obtain expert intellectual property protection in Belarus for your company!
Industrial Property Disputes Before the IP Panel
Copyright and Related Rights Disputes
Recognition of Authorship
Authorship Disputes
Removal from Author List
Copyright Infringement Claims
Compensation for Copyright Violations
Author’s Royalty Disputes
Moral Harm in Related Rights
Damage Recovery
Profits From Infringement
Why Foreign Companies Choose AMBY Legal
Client-Oriented
Comprehensive Approach
Competence
Proven Experience
International Clients
High Qualification
FAQ
The Panel hears: trademark and trade name disputes; patent and utility model disputes; copyright and related rights claims; licensing disputes; unfair competition in IP registration; claims for damages and compensation; and appeals against decisions of the NCIP, the Board of Appeal, and the Ministry of Antimonopoly Regulation and Trade.
For monetary claims, the fee is 5% of the claimed amount — not less than 2 base units (currently 84 rubles). For non-monetary claims, companies and individual entrepreneurs pay 50 base units (currently 2,100 rubles); individuals pay 20 base units (currently 840 rubles). Supervisory appeal fees are 80% of the initial filing fee.
Yes — for disputes between legal entities and individual entrepreneurs. A formal written pre-trial claim must be sent to the other party before proceedings may be initiated. The response period is one month unless the contract specifies otherwise. Individual rights holders are not required to send a pre-trial claim, though it is advisable. AMBY Legal prepares pre-trial claims and manages the full dispute process.
Representation may be carried out by the company’s director, an authorised employee, a licensed advocate, a patent attorney, or in-house legal counsel. Foreign clients must provide a notarised power of attorney — which must be apostilled or consularly legalised depending on the country of origin. AMBY Legal manages all representation requirements for foreign clients.
Cases involving Belarusian applicants must be resolved within two months from filing. For foreign applicants, the timeframe may be up to one year. Appeals arising from administrative decisions must be resolved within one month from filing.
News
You won the arbitration. Months of hearings, written submissions, and legal costs — and the tribunal ruled your way. The award exists on paper. The Belarusian counterparty knows it. And nothing has moved. Getting paid is a different fight entirely. Belarus does recognise foreign arbitral awards — but turning that recognition into actual money involves […]
The contract was signed. Goods were delivered, services rendered, money lent. And then — silence. Payment deadlines passed, calls went unanswered, and the emails from your Belarusian partner became increasingly vague. Now you’re sitting on an unpaid invoice and wondering whether there’s anything you can actually do from abroad. The short answer is yes. Belarus […]
Most companies don’t think much about changing a director until they have to. Then they find out the hard way that getting it wrong — even slightly — can leave the business stuck in an awkward gap: the old director still legally in charge, the new one unable to sign anything or move money. We’ve […]